Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Osprey Farpoint Travel Pack 40

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker

Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker
Capacity22 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions40×28×20 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Greenroom136 RainmakerFeatureOsprey Farpoint Travel Pack 40
Storage
4 Compression 4
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
side Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt hideable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 16in
3 Main Compartments 3
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1000D Cordura210D Nylon Mini Hex Diamond Ripstop

Osprey Farpoint Travel Pack 40

Front facing view of the Osprey Farpoint Travel Pack 40
Capacity40 L
Weight1.6 kg
Dimensions55×35×23 cm
Airline fit67%
Price$185

Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Osprey Farpoint Travel Pack 40

Both have: compression straps, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 127 accept both. 60 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Osprey Farpoint Travel Pack 40.

Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits

Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, Cayman Airways, China Eastern, Croatia Air, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, LC PerĂº, Liat Airlines, Lion Air Group, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Spring Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Volotea, WestJet, Wizz Air, Xiamen.

Choosing a carry-on backpack can feel like a Herculean task. Two optimal choices that often compete for buyers' attention are the Greenroom136 Rainmaker by Greenroom136 and the Osprey Farpoint Travel Pack 40 by Osprey. Both backpacks have their own unique set of features that make them standout choices for avid travelers, yet their differences can affect one's purchasing decision.

The Greenroom136 Rainmaker asserts itself as a solid carry-on backpack. Its dimensions of 40 x 28 x 21 inches and 1.7 pounds weight make it a considerable yet maneuverable pick. It's constructed from sturdy 1000D Cordura that's lauded for its longevity. With a 22-liter carrying capacity and the compatibility with 100% of airlines, it's favored amongst frequent flyers. Like the Farpoint, it also features a compartment to snugly store a 15-inch laptop.

On the other hand, the Osprey Farpoint Travel Pack 40 boasts larger dimensions of 53 x 36 x 23 inches and is lighter at 1.4 pounds. It's fashioned from durable 210D Nylon Mini Hex Diamond Ripstop that guarantees its resilience against wear and tear. Its massive 40-liter capacity places it above the Rainmaker in terms of space. Unfortunately, it's compatible with only 60% of airlines. Just like the Rainmaker, there's a place for a 15-inch laptop.

Summarized differences:

Rating highly amongst reviewers, both backpacks have their own set of worthwhile features. Versatility, sturdiness, and organizational spaces make the Rainmaker a winner. Yet the Farpoint reckons with its superior comfort when loaded, excellent mesh pockets, and handy hideaway straps. No doubt, both present excellent choices. What one selects eventually boils down to individual preference and travel needs.