Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×21 cm |
| Airline fit | 100% |
| Price | $120 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | R |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 0 |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| S | Backpack | S |
| N | Hip Belt | S |
| S | Sternum Strap | R |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | 420-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop, 70-denier 100% nylon ripstop |
Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 0.89 kg |
| Dimensions | 65×31×14 cm |
| Airline fit | 30% |
| Price | $179 |
The Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L are both valuable options for individuals seeking a reliable carry-on backpack. The Rainmaker, the taller and bulkier of the two, is optimized for maximizing function. With a hefty capacity of 22 liters, this backpack shines for its 100% airline compatibility. Constructed of 1000D Cordura, it’s supremely sturdy. Perhaps one of its standout features – according to multiple users – is its option for customization, reflecting the unique needs of each user.
The Ascensionist Pack 35L, on the other hand, is the choice for those in search of something lightweight and eco-friendly. With an impressively light weight of only 0.89 pounds and the ability to carry 35 liters, the Ascensionist Pack offers more carry capacity for less physical burden. It is made of 420-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop in alignment with Patagonia's commitment to sustainability. However, airline compatibility is a bit of a downside, standing at 30%.
Comparison Bullet Points:
-
Size: The Rainmaker is taller and wider than the Ascensionist Pack.
-
Weight: The Rainmaker weighs nearly twice as much as the Ascensionist Pack.
-
Capacity: The Rainmaker can hold 22 liters, while the Ascensionist Pack can hold a considerable larger volume of 35 liters.
-
Material: The Rainmaker is made of 1000D Cordura, while the Ascensionist Pack is made of recycled nylon ripstop.
-
Laptop Compatibility: The Rainmaker can fit a 15-inch laptop, while the Ascensionist Pack does not have a laptop compartment.
-
Airline Compatibility: The Rainmaker is compatible with 100% of airlines, while the Ascensionist Pack is compatible with 30% only.
Both backpacks are highly recommended by reviewers. Many users of the Rainmaker have praised its excellent value and impressive customizability, noting its sturdy, water-resistant exterior and organizational features. Regarding the Ascensionist pack, reviewers like how lightweight it is for its capacity, along with the use of recycled polyester and a fitting harness system.
In conclusion, both the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Patagonia Ascensionist Pack 35L offer unique features. The Rainmaker appears to be the more traditional, functional pack, overflowing with customizability. This contrasts with the Ascensionist Pack, which shines for its environmental consciousness and uniquely lightweight, yet highly accommodating features. The right pack for you, as always, depends on your specific needs.