Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Osprey Porter 46

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker

Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker
Capacity22 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions40×28×20 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Greenroom136 RainmakerFeatureOsprey Porter 46
Storage
4 Compression 2
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
side Passport top
N Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt hideable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 16in
3 Main Compartments 4
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1000D Cordurabluesign®-approved Recycled 500D Nylon Packcloth PFC Free DWR

Osprey Porter 46

Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46
Capacity46 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions55×36×23 cm
Airline fit61%
Price$185

Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Osprey Porter 46

Both have: sternum strap, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 116 accept both. 71 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Osprey Porter 46.

Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits

Aerolineas Argentinas, Air Baltic, Air China, Air France, Air India, Air Malta, Air Mauritius, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Boliviana de Aviacion, Bulgaria Air, Cayman Airways, China Eastern, Croatia Air, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air, Icelandair, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Juneyao Airlines, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , LC Perú, Liat Airlines, Lion Air Group, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sky Airlines, Spring Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Volotea, WestJet, Wizz Air, Xiamen.

In the world of travel backpacks, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Osprey Porter 46 stand out for their style and craftsmanship, but each brings different strengths to the table. The Greenroom136 Rainmaker, as its name implies, is a powerhouse in the face of inclement weather, thanks to its 1000D Cordura construction. Its size is also more universally accepted by airlines, which is a significant advantage for the frequent traveler.

The Osprey Porter 46, on the other hand, offers a much larger capacity, nearly double that of the Rainmaker, and is more lightweight. However, with these added benefits, it sacrifices on airline compatibility, well-received with only 47% of airlines. Despite this, the bag's nylon construction lends itself to durability and longevity, similar to the Rainmaker's Cordura.

Comparison Bullet Points:

The Rainmaker, described by reviewers as a solid and customizable pack, is billed as the perfect option for those needing to transport both a laptop and iPad without worry. On the contrary, the Porter 46 garners much of its praise for its substantial capacity, and gear-hauling capabilities. The optional shoulder strap also gives it versatility, and it is recognized as an excellent value considering its price point.

To summarise, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker stands out for its weather resistance and airline compatibility. In contrast, the Osprey Porter 46 is lauded for its immense capacity and comfort. However, both are equally versatile and durable, making them excellent options for a travel backpack, depending on the needs and preferences of the user.