Cotopaxi Nazca 24L vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack Small

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L
Capacity24 L
Weight1.33 kg
Dimensions50×27×14 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$80

Feature by feature

Cotopaxi Nazca 24LFeatureFjallraven Travel Pack Small
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630D nylon/cotton canvasG-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton

Fjallraven Travel Pack Small

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small
Capacity20 L
Weight1.35 kg
Dimensions40×29×17 cm
Airline fit98%
Price$195

Key differences between the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L and Fjallraven Travel Pack Small

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 173 accept both. 1 accept only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L, and 13 accept only the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small.

Only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Spring Airlines, Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Cotopaxi Nazca 24L vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack Small: which should you pack?

The Cotopaxi Nazca 24L carries 4L more than the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small (24L vs. 20L), while the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L is the lighter pack at 1.33kg (vs. 1.35kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Travel Pack Small fits 98% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L; if you want to travel lighter, the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L is the better call.