Lander Traveler Bag 35L vs. Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Lander Traveler Bag 35L

Front facing view of the Lander Traveler Bag 35L
Capacity35 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions61×34×21 cm
Airline fit5%
Price$175

Feature by feature

Lander Traveler Bag 35LFeatureKathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt hideable
Y Sternum Strap hideable
Inside
17in Laptop 17in
3 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Cordura EcoMadeRecycled Polyester/Nylon

Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack

Front facing view of the Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack
Capacity38 L
Weight1.31 kg
Dimensions55.88×32×28.45 cm
Airline fit2%
Price$150

Key differences between the Lander Traveler Bag 35L and Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 4 accept both. 6 accept only the Lander Traveler Bag 35L, and 0 accept only the Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack.

Only the Lander Traveler Bag 35L fits

Conviasa, Frontier Airlines, Island Air, PenAir, Southwest Airlines, Sun Country.

Lander Traveler Bag 35L vs. Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack: which should you pack?

The Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack carries 3L more than the Lander Traveler Bag 35L (35L vs. 38L), while the Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack is the lighter pack at 1.31kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Lander Traveler Bag 35L fits 5% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack; if you want to travel lighter, the Kathmandu Litehaul 38L Carry-On Pack is the better call.