Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack vs. Fjallraven Vardag 28

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack

Capacity25 L
Weight1.3 kg
Dimensions53×28×17 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$270

Feature by feature

Remote Equipment Charlie 25 PackFeatureFjallraven Vardag 28
Storage
5 Compression 2
30L Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 4
top Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
2 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Challenge Outdoor EPX200100% polyester 600D (recycled)

Fjallraven Vardag 28

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Vardag 28
Capacity28 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions50×29×18 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$100

Key differences between the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack and Fjallraven Vardag 28

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 167 accept both. 1 accept only the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack, and 6 accept only the Fjallraven Vardag 28.

Only the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Fjallraven Vardag 28 fits

Air Niugini, Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Royal Jordanian.

Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack vs. Fjallraven Vardag 28: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven Vardag 28 carries 3L more than the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack (25L vs. 28L), while the Fjallraven Vardag 28 is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.3kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Vardag 28 fits 92% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Vardag 28; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Vardag 28 is the better call.