Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack vs. Kifaru Antero

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack

Capacity25 L
Weight1.3 kg
Dimensions53×28×17 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$270

Feature by feature

Remote Equipment Charlie 25 PackFeatureKifaru Antero
Storage
5 Compression 2
30L Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 1
top Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
2 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Challenge Outdoor EPX200500 Denier Cordura Lined with 400 D packcloth

Kifaru Antero

Front facing view of the Kifaru Antero
Capacity25 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions48×25×15 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$415

Key differences between the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack and Kifaru Antero

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, hip belt, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 168 accept both. 0 accept only the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack, and 8 accept only the Kifaru Antero.

Only the Kifaru Antero fits

Air Niugini, Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia.

Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack vs. Kifaru Antero: which should you pack?

The Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack carries the same capacity as the Kifaru Antero (25L vs. 25L), while the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack is the lighter pack at 1.3kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Kifaru Antero fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack; if you want to travel lighter, the Remote Equipment Charlie 25 Pack is the better call.