Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack vs. Kifaru Antero

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack

Capacity31 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions54×29×20 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$400

Feature by feature

Remote Equipment Alpha 31 PackFeatureKifaru Antero
Storage
4 Compression 2
36L Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 1
top Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
16in Laptop 15in
6 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Challenge Outdoor EPX600500 Denier Cordura Lined with 400 D packcloth

Kifaru Antero

Front facing view of the Kifaru Antero
Capacity25 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions48×25×15 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$415

Key differences between the Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack and Kifaru Antero

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 0 accept only the Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack, and 10 accept only the Kifaru Antero.

Only the Kifaru Antero fits

Air Niugini, Belavia, Etihad Airways, Great Lakes Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack vs. Kifaru Antero: which should you pack?

The Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack carries 6L more than the Kifaru Antero (31L vs. 25L), while the Kifaru Antero is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Kifaru Antero fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Remote Equipment Alpha 31 Pack; if you want to travel lighter, the Kifaru Antero is the better call.