Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L vs. NEEKFOX 35L Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L
Capacity32 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions51×31×23 cm
Airline fit71%
Price$119

Feature by feature

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32LFeatureNEEKFOX 35L Backpack
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 13in
3 Main Compartments 2
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 450-denier 100% polyesterRipstop Nylon

NEEKFOX 35L Backpack

Front facing view of the NEEKFOX 35L Backpack
Capacity35 L
Weight0.4 kg
Dimensions53×33×23 cm
Airline fit70%
Price$24

Key differences between the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L and NEEKFOX 35L Backpack

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 132 accept both. 2 accept only the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L, and 0 accept only the NEEKFOX 35L Backpack.

Only the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L fits

Oman Air, Royal Jordanian.

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L vs. NEEKFOX 35L Backpack: which should you pack?

The NEEKFOX 35L Backpack carries 3L more than the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L (32L vs. 35L), while the NEEKFOX 35L Backpack is the lighter pack at 0.4kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L fits 71% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the NEEKFOX 35L Backpack; if you want to travel lighter, the NEEKFOX 35L Backpack is the better call.