Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L vs. Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L
Capacity32 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions51×31×23 cm
Airline fit71%
Price$119

Feature by feature

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32LFeatureNeekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop N
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 450-denier 100% polyesterRip-resistant nylon fabric

Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack

Front facing view of the Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack
Capacity30 L
Weight0.4 kg
Dimensions47×28×23 cm
Airline fit74%
Price$19

Key differences between the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L and Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 134 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L, and 5 accept only the Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack.

Only the Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack fits

Etihad Airways, Great Lakes Airlines, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L vs. Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L carries 2L more than the Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack (32L vs. 30L), while the Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack is the lighter pack at 0.4kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack fits 74% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L; if you want to travel lighter, the Neekfox 30L Lightweight Backpack is the better call.