Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L vs. Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L
Capacity32 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions51×31×23 cm
Airline fit71%
Price$119

Feature by feature

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32LFeatureCotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L
Storage
Y Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 450-denier 100% polyester100% repurposed 600D polyester

Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L
Capacity26 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions53×33×23 cm
Airline fit70%
Price$110

Key differences between the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L and Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 132 accept both. 2 accept only the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L, and 0 accept only the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L.

Only the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L fits

Oman Air, Royal Jordanian.

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L vs. Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L carries 6L more than the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L (32L vs. 26L), while the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L is the lighter pack at 0.7kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L fits 71% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L; if you want to travel lighter, the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L is the better call.