Black Ember Citadel R3 25 vs. Timbuk2 Scheme

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Black Ember Citadel R3 25

Front facing view of the Black Ember Citadel R3 25
Capacity25 L
Weight1.6 kg
Dimensions50×31×18 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$280

Feature by feature

Black Ember Citadel R3 25FeatureTimbuk2 Scheme
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport side
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
14in Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 6
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
421 VELOCITY CORDURA re/cor RN66

Timbuk2 Scheme

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Scheme
Capacity21 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions43×30×14 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$180

Key differences between the Black Ember Citadel R3 25 and Timbuk2 Scheme

Both have: luggage passthrough, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. 0 accept only the Black Ember Citadel R3 25, and 8 accept only the Timbuk2 Scheme.

Only the Timbuk2 Scheme fits

Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Black Ember Citadel R3 25 vs. Timbuk2 Scheme: which should you pack?

The Black Ember Citadel R3 25 carries 4L more than the Timbuk2 Scheme (25L vs. 21L), while the Timbuk2 Scheme is the lighter pack at 1.2kg (vs. 1.6kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Timbuk2 Scheme fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Black Ember Citadel R3 25; if you want to travel lighter, the Timbuk2 Scheme is the better call.