LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag vs. Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag

Front facing view of the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag
Capacity35 L
Weight1.6 kg
Dimensions53×36×12 cm
Airline fit81%
Price$170

Feature by feature

LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop BagFeatureKathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack
Storage
Y Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
17in Laptop N
5 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly optional
2 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant N
Material
1000D CorduraLightweight water resistant polyester inner linings in bright yellowYKK Aquaguard zippers210 Nylon HT Rip Stop Cordura™, 210 Polyester Oxford

Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack

Front facing view of the Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack
Capacity20 L
Weight0.44 kg
Dimensions46×25×22 cm
Airline fit75%
Price$100

Key differences between the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag and Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 121 accept both. 32 accept only the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag, and 20 accept only the Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack.

Only the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag fits

Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Icelandair, Juneyao Airlines, Liat Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Volotea, Xiamen.

Only the Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack fits

Aerolineas Argentinas, Air France, Air India, Air Mauritius, Boliviana de Aviacion, Cayman Airways, Etihad Airways, Great Lakes Airlines, Indigo, Jet Airways, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Sky Airlines, Virgin Australia.

When comparing carry on backpacks, two that stand out are the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag and the Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack. Each bag has features that distinguish it from the other. The LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag stands taller and wider, with a depth that allows for a capacity of 35 liters. The robustness of this bag reflects the heavier weight of 1.6 pounds and its compatibility with 98% of airlines. Designed with sturdy 1000D Cordura, water-resistant polyester inner linings, and YKK Aquaguard zippers, the LBBJKT is as competent at resisting the elements as it is at securing your belongings. A dedicated compartment fits up to a 17" laptop, and its well-organized pocket system does great work in neatly storing your essentials.

However, if one is on the lookout for a lightweight alternative, the Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack cuts an impressive figure. Despite standing shorter and narrower, this model is deeper and boasts a 20-litre capacity. Designed with 210 Nylon HT Rip Stop Cordura™ and 210 Polyester Oxford, this backpack weighs a mere 0.44 pounds. Although this lighter weight might correlate with its compatibility rating of 68% with airlines, the Dash 20L stands strong with its impressive lightness, sturdy materials, and comfortable wear.

Comparison points:

Despite these conflicting characteristics, both bags maintain high standards in terms of their materials, functionality, and comfort. This is reflected in the positive reviews from satisfied users, praising both the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag for its special features such as expandable storage and organized pockets, as well as the Kathmandu Dash 20L Lightweight Backpack for its comfortable wear and lightweight design. Each bag employs great workmanship in their creation, therefore making them exceptional choices for a carry-on backpack. It is evident that the choice between the two comes down to individual preferences in size, weight, and storage requirements.