Exped Transit 40 vs. Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 55L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Transit 40

Front facing view of the Exped Transit 40
Capacity40 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions60×33×25 cm
Airline fit5%
Price$88

Feature by feature

Exped Transit 40FeaturePatagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 55L
Storage
Y Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 1
N Passport side
N Passthrough Y
Carry
removable Backpack removable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
840 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column Oeko-Tex 100 certified100% recycled polyester ripstop with a matte, recycled TPU-film laminate

Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 55L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 55L
Capacity55 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions58×34×24 cm
Airline fit5%
Price$170

Key differences between the Exped Transit 40 and Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 55L

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 10 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

Exped Transit 40 vs. Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 55L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 55L carries 15L more than the Exped Transit 40 (40L vs. 55L), while the Exped Transit 40 is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Exped Transit 40 fits 5% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Black Hole® Duffel Bag 55L; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Transit 40 is the better call.