Millican Mathew vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Millican Mathew

Front facing view of the Millican Mathew
Capacity22 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions40×33×15 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$180

Feature by feature

Millican MathewFeatureCotopaxi Nazca 24L
Storage
N Compression
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
N Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Backpack
N Hip Belt
N Sternum Strap
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
Rain-fly N
Water Bottle Holder
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% organic cotton canvas outer (weatherproofed)Waterproof 100% recycled polyester rain cover100% organic cotton lining70% vegetable tanned leather.cotton/polyester canvas shell

Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L
Capacity24 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions51×27×14 cm
Airline fit90%
Price$140

Key differences between the Millican Mathew and Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Both have: laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 169 accept both. 12 accept only the Millican Mathew, and 1 accept only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L.

Only the Millican Mathew fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris.

Only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Millican Mathew vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L: which should you pack?

The Cotopaxi Nazca 24L carries 2L more than the Millican Mathew (22L vs. 24L), while the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L is the lighter pack at 1.1kg (vs. 1.2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Millican Mathew fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L; if you want to travel lighter, the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L is the better call.