Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack vs. ULA Equipment Ultra Camino

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack

Front facing view of the Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack
Capacity28 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions56×28×18 cm
Airline fit47%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Matador Beast28 Packable BackpackFeatureULA Equipment Ultra Camino
Storage
4 Compression >5
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt Y
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop N
2 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
210D Robic® high tenacity nylon, UTS coated, DWR finishULTRA 400TX

ULA Equipment Ultra Camino

Front facing view of the ULA Equipment Ultra Camino
Capacity54 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions56×33×21 cm
Airline fit47%
Price$400

Key differences between the Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack and ULA Equipment Ultra Camino

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 88 accept both. 1 accept only the Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack, and 0 accept only the ULA Equipment Ultra Camino.

Only the Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack vs. ULA Equipment Ultra Camino: which should you pack?

The ULA Equipment Ultra Camino carries 26L more than the Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack (28L vs. 54L), while the Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack is the lighter pack at 0.7kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack fits 47% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the ULA Equipment Ultra Camino; if you want to travel lighter, the Matador Beast28 Packable Backpack is the better call.