Kifaru Urban Ruck vs. Deuter Flyt 20

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Kifaru Urban Ruck

Front facing view of the Kifaru Urban Ruck
Capacity22.9 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×29×17 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$231

Feature by feature

Kifaru Urban RuckFeatureDeuter Flyt 20
Storage
Y Compression Y
27L Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
500 Denier CorduraLined with 400 D packcloth210D PA, 100D PA High Tenacity

Deuter Flyt 20

Front facing view of the Deuter Flyt 20
Capacity20 L
Weight1.18 kg
Dimensions50×26×19 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$178

Key differences between the Kifaru Urban Ruck and Deuter Flyt 20

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 173 accept both. 5 accept only the Kifaru Urban Ruck, and 1 accept only the Deuter Flyt 20.

Only the Kifaru Urban Ruck fits

American Eagle, easyJet, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Only the Deuter Flyt 20 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Kifaru Urban Ruck vs. Deuter Flyt 20: which should you pack?

The Kifaru Urban Ruck carries 2.8999999999999986L more than the Deuter Flyt 20 (22.9L vs. 20L), while the Kifaru Urban Ruck is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.18kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Kifaru Urban Ruck fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Kifaru Urban Ruck; if you want to travel lighter, the Kifaru Urban Ruck is the better call.