Kifaru Urban Ruck vs. ILE Transit 25L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Kifaru Urban Ruck

Front facing view of the Kifaru Urban Ruck
Capacity22.9 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×29×17 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$231

Feature by feature

Kifaru Urban RuckFeatureILE Transit 25L
Storage
Y Compression N
27L Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 2
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop 16in
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
500 Denier CorduraLined with 400 D packclothDurable Cordura, waxed canvas, or XPAC sailcloth exterior

ILE Transit 25L

Front facing view of the ILE Transit 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight2 kg
Dimensions50.8×30.5×15.2 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$220

Key differences between the Kifaru Urban Ruck and ILE Transit 25L

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 169 accept both. 9 accept only the Kifaru Urban Ruck, and 0 accept only the ILE Transit 25L.

Only the Kifaru Urban Ruck fits

Air Niugini, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Kifaru Urban Ruck vs. ILE Transit 25L: which should you pack?

The ILE Transit 25L carries 2.1000000000000014L more than the Kifaru Urban Ruck (22.9L vs. 25L), while the Kifaru Urban Ruck is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Kifaru Urban Ruck fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the ILE Transit 25L; if you want to travel lighter, the Kifaru Urban Ruck is the better call.