Kifaru Urban Ruck vs. Exped Glissade 25

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Kifaru Urban Ruck

Front facing view of the Kifaru Urban Ruck
Capacity22.9 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×29×17 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$231

Feature by feature

Kifaru Urban RuckFeatureExped Glissade 25
Storage
Y Compression Y
27L Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
500 Denier CorduraLined with 400 D packcloth630 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column Oeko-Tex 100 certified

Exped Glissade 25

Front facing view of the Exped Glissade 25
Capacity25 L
Weight1.25 kg
Dimensions51×28×20 cm
Airline fit90%
Price$139

Key differences between the Kifaru Urban Ruck and Exped Glissade 25

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 169 accept both. 9 accept only the Kifaru Urban Ruck, and 1 accept only the Exped Glissade 25.

Only the Kifaru Urban Ruck fits

Air Niugini, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Only the Exped Glissade 25 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Kifaru Urban Ruck vs. Exped Glissade 25: which should you pack?

The Exped Glissade 25 carries 2.1000000000000014L more than the Kifaru Urban Ruck (22.9L vs. 25L), while the Kifaru Urban Ruck is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.25kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Kifaru Urban Ruck fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Glissade 25; if you want to travel lighter, the Kifaru Urban Ruck is the better call.