Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 vs. Macpac Rapaki 22

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26

Front facing view of the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26
Capacity26 L
Weight0.475 kg
Dimensions48×26×20 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$110

Feature by feature

Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26FeatureMacpac Rapaki 22
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% polyamide 210D200D Polyester, 420D Oxford Nylon

Macpac Rapaki 22

Front facing view of the Macpac Rapaki 22
Capacity22 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions10×10×10 cm
Airline fit100%
Price$118

Key differences between the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 and Macpac Rapaki 22

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 176 accept both. 0 accept only the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26, and 13 accept only the Macpac Rapaki 22.

Only the Macpac Rapaki 22 fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, LC Perú, Linea Aerea Amaszonas, Lion Air Group, Ravn Alaska, Spring Airlines, Tianjin Airlines (E145), VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 vs. Macpac Rapaki 22: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 carries 4L more than the Macpac Rapaki 22 (26L vs. 22L), while the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 is the lighter pack at 0.475kg (vs. 0.7kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Macpac Rapaki 22 fits 100% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 is the better call.