Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 vs. Kifaru Urban Ruck

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26

Front facing view of the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26
Capacity26 L
Weight0.475 kg
Dimensions48×26×20 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$110

Feature by feature

Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26FeatureKifaru Urban Ruck
Storage
N Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity 27L
2 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% polyamide 210D500 Denier CorduraLined with 400 D packcloth

Kifaru Urban Ruck

Front facing view of the Kifaru Urban Ruck
Capacity22.9 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×29×17 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$231

Key differences between the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 and Kifaru Urban Ruck

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 175 accept both. 1 accept only the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26, and 3 accept only the Kifaru Urban Ruck.

Only the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Only the Kifaru Urban Ruck fits

American Eagle, easyJet, Ravn Alaska.

Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 vs. Kifaru Urban Ruck: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 carries 3.1000000000000014L more than the Kifaru Urban Ruck (26L vs. 22.9L), while the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 is the lighter pack at 0.475kg (vs. 0.8kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Kifaru Urban Ruck fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26 is the better call.