Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 vs. Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24

Front facing view of the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24
Capacity24 L
Weight0.46 kg
Dimensions45×26×20 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$99

Feature by feature

Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24FeatureOrtlieb Atrack CR Urban
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 0
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% polyamide 210DPS55C

Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban

Front facing view of the Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban
Capacity25 L
Weight1.3 kg
Dimensions56×26×25 cm
Airline fit27%
Price$260

Key differences between the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 and Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 51 accept both. 130 accept only the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24, and 0 accept only the Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban.

Only the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 fits

Aer Lingus, Aeroflot, Aerolineas Argentinas, Aeromexico, Air Asia, Air Baltic, Air Canada, Air Caraibes, Air China, Air France, Air India, Air Macau, Air Malta, Air Mauritius, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, All Nipon Airways, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, American Eagle, ANA, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Austrian, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Belavia, Biman Bangladesh, Blue Air, Boliviana de Aviacion, Brussels Airlines, Bulgaria Air, Cambodia Angkor Air, Cathay Pacific, Cayman Airways, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, China Eastern, CommutAir, Czech Airlines, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Ethiopian Airlines, Etihad Airways, Eurowings, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Flair Air, flybe, Garuda Indonesia, Gol Linhas Aereas, Gulf Air, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, Iberia, Icelandair, Indigo, InselAir, Interjet, Iran Air, Japan Airlines, Jet Airways, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Juneyao Airlines, Kenya Airways, KLM, Kulula, LATAM , Liat Airlines, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Luxair, Mahan Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Meridiana Fly, Mesa Airlines, Nordwind Airlines, Norwegian, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Peach, Porter Airlines, Qantas Airways, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Republic Airways, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, SAS Scandinavian, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sky Airlines, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, SriLankan Airlines, Sun Express, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, Trans States, TUI, Turkish Airlines, Ukraine International, United Airlines, Vietnam Airlines, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Atlantic, Virgin Australia, Volotea, WestJet, Xiamen.

Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 vs. Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban: which should you pack?

The Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban carries 1L more than the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 (24L vs. 25L), while the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 is the lighter pack at 0.46kg (vs. 1.3kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 is the better call.