Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 vs. Kifaru Urban Ruck

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24

Front facing view of the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24
Capacity24 L
Weight0.46 kg
Dimensions45×26×20 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$99

Feature by feature

Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24FeatureKifaru Urban Ruck
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity 27L
3 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% polyamide 210D500 Denier CorduraLined with 400 D packcloth

Kifaru Urban Ruck

Front facing view of the Kifaru Urban Ruck
Capacity22.9 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×29×17 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$231

Key differences between the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 and Kifaru Urban Ruck

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 178 accept both. 3 accept only the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24, and 0 accept only the Kifaru Urban Ruck.

Only the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 fits

Air Tahiti, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air.

Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 vs. Kifaru Urban Ruck: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 carries 1.1000000000000014L more than the Kifaru Urban Ruck (24L vs. 22.9L), while the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 is the lighter pack at 0.46kg (vs. 0.8kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24 is the better call.