Sherpani Santiago vs. Timbuk2 Scheme

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Sherpani Santiago

Front facing view of the Sherpani Santiago
Capacity39 L
Weight1.1 kg
Dimensions53×31×18 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$185

Feature by feature

Sherpani SantiagoFeatureTimbuk2 Scheme
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
front Passport side
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
Y Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
5 Main Compartments 6
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material

Timbuk2 Scheme

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Scheme
Capacity21 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions43×30×14 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$180

Key differences between the Sherpani Santiago and Timbuk2 Scheme

Both have: luggage passthrough, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 167 accept both. 0 accept only the Sherpani Santiago, and 13 accept only the Timbuk2 Scheme.

Only the Timbuk2 Scheme fits

Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia.

Sherpani Santiago vs. Timbuk2 Scheme: which should you pack?

The Sherpani Santiago carries 18L more than the Timbuk2 Scheme (39L vs. 21L), while the Sherpani Santiago is the lighter pack at 1.1kg (vs. 1.2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Timbuk2 Scheme fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Sherpani Santiago; if you want to travel lighter, the Sherpani Santiago is the better call.