Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L vs. Timbuk2 Scheme

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Capacity22 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions46×30×19 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22LFeatureTimbuk2 Scheme
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport side
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
2 Main Compartments 6
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
8.7-oz 300-denier 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop with a postindustrial recycled TPU-film laminate

Timbuk2 Scheme

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Scheme
Capacity21 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions43×30×14 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$180

Key differences between the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L and Timbuk2 Scheme

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 178 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L, and 2 accept only the Timbuk2 Scheme.

Only the Timbuk2 Scheme fits

Air Tahiti, Gulf Air.

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L vs. Timbuk2 Scheme: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L carries 1L more than the Timbuk2 Scheme (22L vs. 21L), while the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Timbuk2 Scheme fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L is the better call.