Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Capacity22 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions46×30×19 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22LFeatureCotopaxi Nazca 24L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport N
Y Passthrough N
Carry
hideable Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
2 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
8.7-oz 300-denier 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop with a postindustrial recycled TPU-film laminate630D nylon/cotton canvas

Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L
Capacity24 L
Weight1.33 kg
Dimensions50×27×14 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$80

Key differences between the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L and Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Both have: laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 173 accept both. 5 accept only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L, and 1 accept only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L.

Only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits

American Eagle, easyJet, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L: which should you pack?

The Cotopaxi Nazca 24L carries 2L more than the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L (22L vs. 24L), while the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.33kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L is the better call.