Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L vs. Black Ember Citadel R3 25

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Capacity22 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions46×30×19 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22LFeatureBlack Ember Citadel R3 25
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 14in
2 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
8.7-oz 300-denier 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop with a postindustrial recycled TPU-film laminate421 VELOCITY CORDURA re/cor RN66

Black Ember Citadel R3 25

Front facing view of the Black Ember Citadel R3 25
Capacity25 L
Weight1.6 kg
Dimensions50×31×18 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$280

Key differences between the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L and Black Ember Citadel R3 25

Both have: luggage passthrough, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. 6 accept only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L, and 0 accept only the Black Ember Citadel R3 25.

Only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits

Air Niugini, American Eagle, easyJet, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L vs. Black Ember Citadel R3 25: which should you pack?

The Black Ember Citadel R3 25 carries 3L more than the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L (22L vs. 25L), while the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.6kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Black Ember Citadel R3 25; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L is the better call.