Fjallraven Kanken 16L vs. Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Kanken 16L

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Kanken 16L
Capacity16 L
Weight0.3 kg
Dimensions36×28×12 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$90

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Kanken 16LFeaturePatagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 4
front Passport front
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
2 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Vinylon F: 100% vinylalBody: 2.4-oz 70-denier ripstop nylon Lining: 3-oz 200-denier 100% polyester with a PU coating

Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L
Capacity27 L
Weight0.4 kg
Dimensions39×26×20 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$100

Key differences between the Fjallraven Kanken 16L and Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 187 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

Fjallraven Kanken 16L vs. Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L carries 11L more than the Fjallraven Kanken 16L (16L vs. 27L), while the Fjallraven Kanken 16L is the lighter pack at 0.3kg (vs. 0.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Kanken 16L fits 99% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Kanken 16L is the better call.