Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac vs. Witzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac

Front facing view of the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac
Capacity22 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions48×29×14 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$250

Feature by feature

Boundary Supply Errant X-PacFeatureWitzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 0
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
17in Laptop 17in
1 Main Compartments 0
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
X-PacThickened canvas, PU Leather

Witzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack

Front facing view of the Witzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack
Capacity25 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions54×34×18 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$66

Key differences between the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac and Witzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack

Both have: compression straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 9 accept only the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac, and 0 accept only the Witzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack.

Only the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac fits

Air Niugini, Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac vs. Witzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack: which should you pack?

The Witzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack carries 3L more than the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac (22L vs. 25L), while the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Witzman Vintage Canvas Rucksack; if you want to travel lighter, the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac is the better call.