Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac vs. Arc'Teryx Granville 20

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac

Front facing view of the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac
Capacity22 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions48×29×14 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$250

Feature by feature

Boundary Supply Errant X-PacFeatureArc'Teryx Granville 20
Storage
Y Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
17in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
X-PacN400r-AC² nylon 6 ripstop

Arc'Teryx Granville 20

Front facing view of the Arc'Teryx Granville 20
Capacity20 L
Weight1.3 kg
Dimensions52×32×18 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$180

Key differences between the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac and Arc'Teryx Granville 20

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 167 accept both. 8 accept only the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac, and 0 accept only the Arc'Teryx Granville 20.

Only the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac fits

Air Niugini, Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia.

Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac vs. Arc'Teryx Granville 20: which should you pack?

The Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac carries 2L more than the Arc'Teryx Granville 20 (22L vs. 20L), while the Arc'Teryx Granville 20 is the lighter pack at 1.3kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac; if you want to travel lighter, the Arc'Teryx Granville 20 is the better call.