Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac vs. DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac

Front facing view of the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac
Capacity22 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions48×29×14 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$250

Feature by feature

Boundary Supply Errant X-PacFeatureDSPTCH Camera Ruckpack
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
17in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
X-PacCORDURA® CLASSIC FABRIC

DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack

Front facing view of the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack
Capacity23 L
Weight1.68 kg
Dimensions45.72×30.48×15.24 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$275

Key differences between the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac and DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 174 accept both. 1 accept only the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac, and 3 accept only the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack.

Only the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac fits

Air Niugini.

Only the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack fits

American Eagle, easyJet, Ravn Alaska.

Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac vs. DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack: which should you pack?

The DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack carries 1L more than the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac (22L vs. 23L), while the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.68kg). For carry-on flexibility, the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack; if you want to travel lighter, the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac is the better call.