Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L vs. DSPTCH Utility Ruck

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L
Capacity28 L
Weight0.666 kg
Dimensions49×31×21 cm
Airline fit73%
Price$89

Feature by feature

Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28LFeatureDSPTCH Utility Ruck
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
630-denier 100% nylon, 450-denier 100% polyester (56% recycled) ripstop410D Nylon Packcloth with DWR coating

DSPTCH Utility Ruck

Front facing view of the DSPTCH Utility Ruck
Capacity28 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions44×31×21 cm
Airline fit76%
Price$204

Key differences between the Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L and DSPTCH Utility Ruck

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 138 accept both. 0 accept only the Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L, and 5 accept only the DSPTCH Utility Ruck.

Only the DSPTCH Utility Ruck fits

American Eagle, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L vs. DSPTCH Utility Ruck: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L carries the same capacity as the DSPTCH Utility Ruck (28L vs. 28L), while the Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L is the lighter pack at 0.666kg (vs. 1.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the DSPTCH Utility Ruck fits 76% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Refugio Backpack 28L is the better call.