Gregory Rhune 25 vs. Fjallraven Raven 28

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Gregory Rhune 25

Front facing view of the Gregory Rhune 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions51×33×20 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Gregory Rhune 25FeatureFjallraven Raven 28
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 4
top Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
N Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1, side Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% Recycled 300D Polyester Ripstop with C0 DWR: Designed without PFASG-1000 HeavyDuty

Fjallraven Raven 28

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Raven 28
Capacity28 L
Weight1 kg
Dimensions47×36×15 cm
Airline fit84%
Price$120

Key differences between the Gregory Rhune 25 and Fjallraven Raven 28

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 155 accept both. 14 accept only the Gregory Rhune 25, and 3 accept only the Fjallraven Raven 28.

Only the Gregory Rhune 25 fits

Aerolineas Argentinas, Air France, Air India, Air Mauritius, Boliviana de Aviacion, Cayman Airways, flybe, Indigo, InselAir, Jet Airways, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , Sky Airlines.

Only the Fjallraven Raven 28 fits

Belavia, Etihad Airways, Qatar Airways.

Gregory Rhune 25 vs. Fjallraven Raven 28: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven Raven 28 carries 3L more than the Gregory Rhune 25 (25L vs. 28L), while the Gregory Rhune 25 is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Gregory Rhune 25 fits 89% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Raven 28; if you want to travel lighter, the Gregory Rhune 25 is the better call.