Gregory Rhune 25 vs. Millican Mathew

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Gregory Rhune 25

Front facing view of the Gregory Rhune 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions51×33×20 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Gregory Rhune 25FeatureMillican Mathew
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
top Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
N Laptop 15in
4 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly
1, side Water Bottle Holder
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% Recycled 300D Polyester Ripstop with C0 DWR: Designed without PFAS100% organic cotton canvas outer (weatherproofed)Waterproof 100% recycled polyester rain cover100% organic cotton lining70% vegetable tanned leather.

Millican Mathew

Front facing view of the Millican Mathew
Capacity22 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions40×33×15 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$180

Key differences between the Gregory Rhune 25 and Millican Mathew

Both have: water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 169 accept both. 0 accept only the Gregory Rhune 25, and 12 accept only the Millican Mathew.

Only the Millican Mathew fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris.

Gregory Rhune 25 vs. Millican Mathew: which should you pack?

The Gregory Rhune 25 carries 3L more than the Millican Mathew (25L vs. 22L), while the Gregory Rhune 25 is the lighter pack at 0.9kg (vs. 1.2kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Millican Mathew fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Gregory Rhune 25; if you want to travel lighter, the Gregory Rhune 25 is the better call.