Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack vs. Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack

Front facing view of the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack
Capacity11.5 L
Weight1.58 kg
Dimensions47×27.5×18 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$80

Feature by feature

Tarion XH Hardshell Camera BackpackFeatureBoundary Supply Errant X-Pac
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 17in
2 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
✓ Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Polyester & PVA HardshellX-Pac

Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac

Front facing view of the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac
Capacity22 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions48×29×14 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$250

Key differences between the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack and Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 175 accept both. 1 accept only the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack, and 0 accept only the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac.

Only the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack vs. Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac: which should you pack?

The Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac carries 10.5L more than the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack (11.5L vs. 22L), while the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.58kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac; if you want to travel lighter, the Boundary Supply Errant X-Pac is the better call.