Exped Cascade 20 vs. Exped Mountain Pro 20

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Cascade 20

Front facing view of the Exped Cascade 20
Capacity20 L
Weight0.84 kg
Dimensions47×27×16 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$129

Feature by feature

Exped Cascade 20FeatureExped Mountain Pro 20
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
13in Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
420 D Oxford nylon, TPU film laminate, >10'000 mm water column420 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 3'000 mm water column

Exped Mountain Pro 20

Front facing view of the Exped Mountain Pro 20
Capacity20 L
Weight1.12 kg
Dimensions50×29×17 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$250

Key differences between the Exped Cascade 20 and Exped Mountain Pro 20

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 173 accept both. 3 accept only the Exped Cascade 20, and 0 accept only the Exped Mountain Pro 20.

Only the Exped Cascade 20 fits

Great Lakes Airlines, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Exped Cascade 20 vs. Exped Mountain Pro 20: which should you pack?

The Exped Cascade 20 carries the same capacity as the Exped Mountain Pro 20 (20L vs. 20L), while the Exped Cascade 20 is the lighter pack at 0.84kg (vs. 1.12kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Exped Cascade 20 fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Cascade 20; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Cascade 20 is the better call.