Fjallraven Greenland Top vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Greenland Top

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Greenland Top
Capacity20 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions43×26×15 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$120

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Greenland TopFeatureCotopaxi Nazca 24L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 1
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton630D nylon/cotton canvas

Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L
Capacity24 L
Weight1.33 kg
Dimensions50×27×14 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$80

Key differences between the Fjallraven Greenland Top and Cotopaxi Nazca 24L

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 174 accept both. 7 accept only the Fjallraven Greenland Top, and 0 accept only the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L.

Only the Fjallraven Greenland Top fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Fjallraven Greenland Top vs. Cotopaxi Nazca 24L: which should you pack?

The Cotopaxi Nazca 24L carries 4L more than the Fjallraven Greenland Top (20L vs. 24L), while the Fjallraven Greenland Top is the lighter pack at 0.7kg (vs. 1.33kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Greenland Top fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cotopaxi Nazca 24L; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Greenland Top is the better call.