Fjallraven Greenland Top vs. Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Capacity | 20 L |
| Weight | 0.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 43×26×15 cm |
| Airline fit | 96% |
| Price | $120 |
Feature by feature
| Fjallraven Greenland Top | Feature | Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium |
|---|
| Storage |
|---|
| N |
Compression |
N |
| None |
Expanded Capacity |
None |
| 3 |
Opening |
3 |
| N |
Passport |
N |
| N |
Passthrough |
N |
| Carry |
|---|
| Y |
Backpack |
Y |
| N |
Hip Belt |
N |
| Y |
Sternum Strap |
Y |
| Inside |
|---|
| 15in |
Laptop |
15in |
| 1 |
Main Compartments |
1 |
| N |
Organizer |
N |
| Outside |
|---|
| × |
Hard Shell |
× |
| N |
Rain-fly |
N |
| 2 |
Water Bottle Holder |
2 |
| Y |
Water Resistant |
Y |
| Material |
| G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton | G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton |
| Capacity | 20 L |
| Weight | 0.96 kg |
| Dimensions | 44×28×13 cm |
| Airline fit | 96% |
| Price | $180 |
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines.
181 accept both.
Every airline that takes one takes the other.
Fjallraven Greenland Top vs. Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium: which should you pack?
The Fjallraven Greenland Top carries
the same capacity as
the Fjallraven Rucksack No. 21 Medium (20L vs. 20L),
while the Fjallraven Greenland Top is the lighter pack at 0.7kg
(vs. 0.96kg).
For carry-on flexibility, the
Fjallraven Greenland Top fits 96%
of the airlines we track — the higher of the two.
If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Greenland Top;
if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Greenland Top is the better call.