Macpac Rapaki 25 vs. Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Macpac Rapaki 25

Front facing view of the Macpac Rapaki 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.91 kg
Dimensions52×30×25 cm
Airline fit39%
Price$140

Feature by feature

Macpac Rapaki 25FeatureKathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L
Storage
Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant N
Material
200D Recycled Polyester, 420D Oxford NylonPolyester 100%

Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L

Front facing view of the Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L
Capacity30 L
Weight0.68 kg
Dimensions53×31×24 cm
Airline fit39%
Price$100

Key differences between the Macpac Rapaki 25 and Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, laptop sleeve.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 73 accept both. 0 accept only the Macpac Rapaki 25, and 1 accept only the Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L.

Only the Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L fits

Aer Lingus.

Macpac Rapaki 25 vs. Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L: which should you pack?

The Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L carries 5L more than the Macpac Rapaki 25 (25L vs. 30L), while the Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L is the lighter pack at 0.68kg (vs. 0.91kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Macpac Rapaki 25 fits 39% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L; if you want to travel lighter, the Kathmandu Cotingo Pack 30L is the better call.