Cotopaxi Tasra 16L vs. Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Cotopaxi Tasra 16L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L
Capacity16 L
Weight0.5 kg
Dimensions43×27×14 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$85

Feature by feature

Cotopaxi Tasra 16LFeatureQuechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
front Passport front
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
13in Laptop N
3 Main Compartments 2
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder N
N Water Resistant N
Material
100% recycled polyester100% Polyester

Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L

Front facing view of the Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L
Capacity10 L
Weight0.1 kg
Dimensions39×21×12 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$10

Key differences between the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L and Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 181 accept both. 0 accept only the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L, and 6 accept only the Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L.

Only the Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L fits

LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Spring Airlines, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Cotopaxi Tasra 16L vs. Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L: which should you pack?

The Cotopaxi Tasra 16L carries 6L more than the Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L (16L vs. 10L), while the Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L is the lighter pack at 0.1kg (vs. 0.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L fits 99% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cotopaxi Tasra 16L; if you want to travel lighter, the Quechua NH50 Arpenaz 10L is the better call.