Fjallraven Vardag 25 vs. Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Vardag 25

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Vardag 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.48 kg
Dimensions43×31×14.5 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$80

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Vardag 25FeatureMacpac Kahu AzTec® 22
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cottonEco AzTec® 8 Canvas — 80% Polyester, 20% Cotton

Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22

Front facing view of the Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22
Capacity22 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions10×10×10 cm
Airline fit100%
Price$90

Key differences between the Fjallraven Vardag 25 and Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 179 accept both. 0 accept only the Fjallraven Vardag 25, and 10 accept only the Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22.

Only the Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22 fits

Air Niugini, Great Lakes Airlines, LC Perú, Linea Aerea Amaszonas, Lion Air Group, Spring Airlines, Tianjin Airlines (E145), VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Fjallraven Vardag 25 vs. Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven Vardag 25 carries 3L more than the Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22 (25L vs. 22L), while the Fjallraven Vardag 25 is the lighter pack at 0.48kg (vs. 0.7kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Macpac Kahu AzTec® 22 fits 100% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Vardag 25; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Vardag 25 is the better call.