L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack vs. Gregory Rhune 25

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack

Front facing view of the L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack
Capacity22 L
Weight0.4 kg
Dimensions48×25×18 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$65

Feature by feature

L.L.Bean Stowaway PackFeatureGregory Rhune 25
Storage
2 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
top Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
N Laptop N
4 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2, side Water Bottle Holder 1, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
70D recycled polyester ripstop100% Recycled 300D Polyester Ripstop with C0 DWR: Designed without PFAS

Gregory Rhune 25

Front facing view of the Gregory Rhune 25
Capacity25 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions51×33×20 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$150

Key differences between the L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack and Gregory Rhune 25

Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 169 accept both. 7 accept only the L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack, and 0 accept only the Gregory Rhune 25.

Only the L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack fits

Air Niugini, Belavia, Etihad Airways, Great Lakes Airlines, Qatar Airways, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack vs. Gregory Rhune 25: which should you pack?

The Gregory Rhune 25 carries 3L more than the L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack (22L vs. 25L), while the L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack is the lighter pack at 0.4kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack fits 93% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Gregory Rhune 25; if you want to travel lighter, the L.L.Bean Stowaway Pack is the better call.