Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Capacity | 16 L |
| Weight | 0.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 44×24×10 cm |
| Airline fit | 100% |
| Price | $125 |
| Hill People Gear Tarahumara | Feature | Osprey Flapjill |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 0 | Opening | 0 |
| N | Passport | side |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| S | Backpack | |
| R | Hip Belt | R |
| S | Sternum Strap | |
| Inside | ||
| 0 | Laptop | 15 |
| 2 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| N | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2 | Water Bottle Holder | |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 500D Cordura | 600D Polyspun |
| Capacity | 19 L |
| Weight | 0.9 kg |
| Dimensions | 46×34×23 cm |
| Airline fit | 98% |
| Price | $110 |
The Hill People Gear Tarahumara and the Osprey Flapjill may appear similar in their fundamental purpose as carry-on backpacks, but delve a little deeper and you'll find each possesses distinctive qualities that set them apart. Allow me to begin with the Hill People Gear Tarahumara. At a mere 0.7 pounds, it is significantly lighter than the Flapjill, making it effortlessly convenient for on-the-go travels. Spanning the dimensions of 44 inches in height, 24 inches in width, and 10 inches in depth, it provides ample storage with a capacity of 16 liters. Designed with 500D Cordura, its sturdiness is commendable. However, it lacks a laptop compartment, with a focus more on essentials for day hiking.
In comparison, the Osprey Flapjill strikes a balance between portability and storage space. Marginally heavier at 0.9 pounds, it compensates with an enhanced width of 34 inches and depth of 23 inches, thus boasting a larger capacity of 19 liters. A welcoming feature is its dedicated laptop compartment, able to accommodate a 15-inch device, making it favorable for digital nomads. Crafted from 600D Polyspun, it also guarantees longevity of usage.
In summary, here's a crisp comparison between the two:
Reviewer sentiment about both backpacks echoes the sentiments noted above. Tarahumara admirers value its simplicity, diminutive exterior appearance, space-efficiency, and the convenience of its center zip for easy access to the main compartment. Conversely, praise for the Flapjill centers around its higher storage capacity and laptop-friendly provisions. Both are considered staunchly built, reliable, and ideally suitable for their respective functions. While Tarahumara bags the title of 'best overall solution to the one-daypack question', Flapjill robustly caters to the urban travelers' needs. It all boils down to your personal preference and specific requirements; the decision laying solely in your hands to opt for one over the other.