Nomatic Travel 30L Bag vs. Transit Travel Backpack 35L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Nomatic Travel 30L Bag

Front facing view of the Nomatic Travel 30L Bag
Capacity30 L
Weight1.6 kg
Dimensions48×33×23 cm
Airline fit73%
Price$310

Feature by feature

Nomatic Travel 30L BagFeatureTransit Travel Backpack 35L
Storage
N Compression 2
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
removable Hip Belt optional, hideable
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 16in
7 Main Compartments 7
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly Y
1, top Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Waterproof tarpaulin

Transit Travel Backpack 35L

Front facing view of the Transit Travel Backpack 35L
Capacity30 L
Weight1.9 kg
Dimensions50×29×22 cm
Airline fit72%
Price$300

Key differences between the Nomatic Travel 30L Bag and Transit Travel Backpack 35L

Both have: passport pocket, luggage passthrough, backpack straps, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 136 accept both. 2 accept only the Nomatic Travel 30L Bag, and 1 accept only the Transit Travel Backpack 35L.

Only the Nomatic Travel 30L Bag fits

Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Only the Transit Travel Backpack 35L fits

Pakistan International.

Nomatic Travel 30L Bag vs. Transit Travel Backpack 35L: which should you pack?

The Nomatic Travel 30L Bag carries the same capacity as the Transit Travel Backpack 35L (30L vs. 30L), while the Nomatic Travel 30L Bag is the lighter pack at 1.6kg (vs. 1.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Nomatic Travel 30L Bag fits 73% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Nomatic Travel 30L Bag; if you want to travel lighter, the Nomatic Travel 30L Bag is the better call.