Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L vs. Fjallraven Greenland Top Large

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight0.45 kg
Dimensions49×27×13 cm
Airline fit92%
Price$79

Feature by feature

Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25LFeatureFjallraven Greenland Top Large
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
600-denier 100% recycled polyester, 200-denier 100% recycled polyesterG-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton

Fjallraven Greenland Top Large

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large
Capacity30 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions52×28×18 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$150

Key differences between the Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L and Fjallraven Greenland Top Large

Both have: backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 168 accept both. 6 accept only the Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L, and 0 accept only the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large.

Only the Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L fits

Air Niugini, Belavia, Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Royal Jordanian.

Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L vs. Fjallraven Greenland Top Large: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven Greenland Top Large carries 5L more than the Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L (25L vs. 30L), while the Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L is the lighter pack at 0.45kg (vs. 0.8kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L fits 92% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Greenland Top Large; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Arbor Linked Pack 25L is the better call.