MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack vs. Stio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack

by MEC
Capacity40 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions50×35×23 cm
Airline fit71%
Price$200

Feature by feature

MEC Outpost 40L Travel PackFeatureStio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L
Storage
4 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
top Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
removable Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 17in
4 Main Compartments 5
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1, side Water Bottle Holder 1, side
N Water Resistant N
Material
PU coated 300-denier ripstop100% recycled polyester

Stio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L

by Stio
Front facing view of the Stio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L
Capacity30 L
Weight1.6 kg
Dimensions53×31×23 cm
Airline fit70%
Price$200

Key differences between the MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack and Stio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L

Both have: passport pocket, luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, water bottle pockets.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 131 accept both. 4 accept only the MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack, and 1 accept only the Stio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L.

Only the MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack fits

Etihad Airways, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Royal Jordanian.

Only the Stio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L fits

Cayman Airways.

MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack vs. Stio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L: which should you pack?

The MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack carries 10L more than the Stio Basin XT Travel Pack 30L (40L vs. 30L), while the MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack is the lighter pack at 1.4kg (vs. 1.6kg). For carry-on flexibility, the MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack fits 71% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack; if you want to travel lighter, the MEC Outpost 40L Travel Pack is the better call.