STM Trilogy vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

STM Trilogy

by Stm
Front facing view of the STM Trilogy
Capacity24 L
Weight0.64 kg
Dimensions46×30×16 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$80

Feature by feature

STM TrilogyFeatureebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 1
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% polyesterBallistic Nylon

ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Front facing view of the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack
Capacity0 L
Weight4.1 kg
Dimensions55×34×20 cm
Airline fit86%
Price$300

Key differences between the STM Trilogy and ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Both have: built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 163 accept both. 15 accept only the STM Trilogy, and 0 accept only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.

Only the STM Trilogy fits

Air Niugini, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Liat Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Scoot, Tiger Airways, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

STM Trilogy vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack: which should you pack?

The STM Trilogy carries 24L more than the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack (24L vs. 0L), while the STM Trilogy is the lighter pack at 0.64kg (vs. 4.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the STM Trilogy fits 94% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the STM Trilogy; if you want to travel lighter, the STM Trilogy is the better call.