Arcido Saxon vs. Quechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Arcido Saxon

Front facing view of the Arcido Saxon
Capacity25 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions45×33×20 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$119

Feature by feature

Arcido SaxonFeatureQuechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity 27L
1 Opening 2
N Passport front
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 2, side
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Kodra Nylon100% Polyester

Quechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack

Front facing view of the Quechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack
Capacity23 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions46×28×22 cm
Airline fit75%
Price$60

Key differences between the Arcido Saxon and Quechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 140 accept both. 39 accept only the Arcido Saxon, and 1 accept only the Quechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack.

Only the Arcido Saxon fits

Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, flybe, Gulf Air, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, Liat Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Volotea, Xiamen.

Only the Quechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack fits

Great Lakes Airlines.

Arcido Saxon vs. Quechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack: which should you pack?

The Arcido Saxon carries 2L more than the Quechua NH 500 Hiking Backpack (25L vs. 23L), while the Arcido Saxon is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 0.8kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Arcido Saxon fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arcido Saxon; if you want to travel lighter, the Arcido Saxon is the better call.