Arcido Saxon vs. Black Ember Citadel R3 25

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Arcido Saxon

Front facing view of the Arcido Saxon
Capacity25 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions45×33×20 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$119

Feature by feature

Arcido SaxonFeatureBlack Ember Citadel R3 25
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport top
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 14in
1 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Kodra Nylon421 VELOCITY CORDURA re/cor RN66

Black Ember Citadel R3 25

Front facing view of the Black Ember Citadel R3 25
Capacity25 L
Weight1.6 kg
Dimensions50×31×18 cm
Airline fit91%
Price$280

Key differences between the Arcido Saxon and Black Ember Citadel R3 25

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. 7 accept only the Arcido Saxon, and 0 accept only the Black Ember Citadel R3 25.

Only the Arcido Saxon fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Virgin Australia.

Arcido Saxon vs. Black Ember Citadel R3 25: which should you pack?

The Arcido Saxon carries the same capacity as the Black Ember Citadel R3 25 (25L vs. 25L), while the Arcido Saxon is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.6kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Arcido Saxon fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arcido Saxon; if you want to travel lighter, the Arcido Saxon is the better call.