Arcido Saxon vs. Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Arcido Saxon

Front facing view of the Arcido Saxon
Capacity25 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions45×33×20 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$119

Feature by feature

Arcido SaxonFeaturePatagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
N Passport N
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Kodra Nylon8.7-oz 300-denier 100% postconsumer recycled polyester ripstop with a postindustrial recycled TPU-film laminate

Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Capacity22 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions46×30×19 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$150

Key differences between the Arcido Saxon and Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L

Both have: luggage passthrough, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 177 accept both. 2 accept only the Arcido Saxon, and 1 accept only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L.

Only the Arcido Saxon fits

Air Tahiti, Gulf Air.

Only the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L fits

Air Niugini.

Arcido Saxon vs. Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L: which should you pack?

The Arcido Saxon carries 3L more than the Patagonia Black Hole Micro MLC 22L (25L vs. 22L), while the Arcido Saxon is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 0.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Arcido Saxon fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arcido Saxon; if you want to travel lighter, the Arcido Saxon is the better call.